Excellent paper, Tracie. I tried to be hyper critical and find some kind of flaw to give you feedback on. One tiny thing - I think you should spell out numbers less than 10 (you mentioned 3 apps, for example). Other than that, a perfect paper. Nicely done.
As an aside, I was thinking that the levels of mastery listed in your literature review would work perfectly for our project.
Why thank you Barbra! yes, the information on the levels of mastery and correlating support was really interesting - I'd like to look into that a little more and see if there are some frameworks for that - I'm sure there are.
For some reason, the font on this paper is illegible. I doubt it matters, as I don't think I'd be able to offer any useful comments (based on Barbra's comment), and would just end up saying "good job!" anyway.
Excellent paper, Tracie. I tried to be hyper critical and find some kind of flaw to give you feedback on. One tiny thing - I think you should spell out numbers less than 10 (you mentioned 3 apps, for example). Other than that, a perfect paper. Nicely done.
ReplyDeleteAs an aside, I was thinking that the levels of mastery listed in your literature review would work perfectly for our project.
Why thank you Barbra! yes, the information on the levels of mastery and correlating support was really interesting - I'd like to look into that a little more and see if there are some frameworks for that - I'm sure there are.
ReplyDeleteFor some reason, the font on this paper is illegible. I doubt it matters, as I don't think I'd be able to offer any useful comments (based on Barbra's comment), and would just end up saying "good job!" anyway.
ReplyDelete